Key Differences of Former and New Writing Test of MUET

The article discusses the key differences between the former and new writing tests of the Malaysian University English Test (MUET) that align with the CEFR.

The writing component of the Malaysian University English Test (MUET) has changed significantly to match the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). This alignment seeks to better assess the English competency of students. We list below the main variations between former and new MUET writing formats.

Former MUET Writing Style: Test Structure and Format

Two written assignments made up the test.

• Task 1: Interpret and explain data shown graphically—that is, in tables, graphs, or charts. This work required between 150 and 200 words.
• Task 2: Usually requiring the candidate to discuss or justify a point of view, write an essay on a specific topic spanning 350–400 words.

A new MUET writing style (CEFR-aligned):

The test, which consists of two writing assignments, has various objectives.

• The first task involves composing a letter or email that is approximately 100 to 150 words in length. The task evaluates formal or semi-formal practical writing abilities.
• Task 2: On a particular topic—discursive, argumentative, or opinion-based—write an essay of roughly 250 words (minimum). The emphasis is on building cogent arguments and offering logical views in line.

Previously used MUET Writing Format:

• Task 1: Candidates were to produce a descriptive report and interpret data from visual stimuli.
• Task 2: Candidates composed essays on a variety of subjects with an eye to logically and coherently expressing ideas and arguments.

A new MUET writing style (CEFR-aligned):

• The first task requires candidates to write either a letter or an email. This shift highlights the need for effective communication in real-world settings and practical writing abilities.
• Task 2: The essay remains, but with a focus on critical thinking and methodical argumentation, the subjects align more closely with the CEFR criteria.

The changes to the MUET writing style demonstrate an attempt to better evaluate academic and practical writing abilities, as well as conform to international norms. The revised CEFR-aligned structure gives more weight to critical thinking and practical writing assignments, therefore offering a more complete picture of a candidate's English competency. To perform well on the MUET, students should become familiar with the new task types and evaluation criteria.